Preview prototype, still being built. Examples are fictional; nothing here is sold, submitted or analyzed. Preview hub
Prototype
Feedback tools
Sermon feedback
- You would provide
- Manuscript text · Primary passage · Audience description · Target length (minutes)
- Scope
- Textual interpretation and written communication.
- Not covered
- Vocal delivery, pacing or presence — these cannot be judged from text.
- You would receive
- Reviewed scope, evidence, three prioritized improvements, uncertainties and next actions.
Example input (fictional)
Fictional excerpt (5 paragraphs, paraphrased; no Scripture is quoted)
- ¶1
- Opening story about a family moving into a new neighborhood and not knowing anyone.
- ¶2
- A second story about the first day at a new job.
- ¶3
- Main claim: God welcomes outsiders before they have proven anything.
- ¶4
- Illustration about a dinner table with an empty chair, before the passage is explained.
- ¶5
- Three closing applications: invite a neighbor, join a group, and pray daily.
Example report — not an analysis of your input
Reviewed scope
Only the five fictional paragraphs shown (¶1–¶5). The rest of a manuscript and the passage itself were not provided.
Evidence
- The main claim first appears in ¶3, after two opening stories. [¶1, ¶2, ¶3]
- ¶4 gives an illustration before any explanation of the passage. [¶4]
- ¶5 ends with three separate applications. [¶5]
Three prioritized improvements
- Move the main claim from ¶3 into or right after ¶1. [¶1, ¶3]
- Explain the passage before the illustration in ¶4. [¶4]
- Keep one of the three applications in ¶5 to sharpen the landing. [¶5]
Uncertainties
- The passage text was not provided, so faithfulness to it cannot be assessed.
- Audience and target length were not provided.
Next actions
- Rewrite the opening so ¶3's claim comes first.
- Draft one paragraph explaining the passage before ¶4.
Website feedback
- You would provide
- Public website URL · The visitor task to check (e.g. find service times)
- Scope
- Only pages actually checked in a future implementation will be reported.
- Not covered
- No live fetching in this prototype; no private or logged-in pages.
- You would receive
- Pages checked, evidence per page, three prioritized improvements, uncertainties, next actions.
Example input (fictional)
Fictional church site — text and layout notes from two pages
- H1
- Home, top of page: large photo with the words “Welcome home.” No times or address.
- H2
- Home, footer (small text): “Sundays 10:00 am”.
- V1
- Visit page: embedded map only; no street address written as text.
- V2
- Visit page: “Questions? Use our contact form.” No reply time stated.
Example report — not an analysis of your input
Reviewed scope
Only the four fictional notes shown, from a home page and a visit page. Visitor task: find when and where to attend.
Evidence
- The service time appears only in the home page footer (H2), not at the top (H1). [H1, H2]
- The visit page gives no written address (V1). [V1]
- The contact prompt does not say when someone will reply (V2). [V2]
Three prioritized improvements
- Add the Sunday time from H2 to the top of the home page (H1). [H1, H2]
- Write the street address as text next to the map (V1). [V1]
- State an expected reply time beside the contact prompt (V2). [V2]
Uncertainties
- Mobile layout was not described in the notes.
- Other pages were not provided.
Next actions
- Update the home page top section.
- Add address text to the visit page.
Budget feedback
- You would provide
- De-identified category totals · Period · Budget vs. actual · Fund restrictions
- Scope
- Transparent calculations on totals you provide.
- Not covered
- No donor, payroll or bank data. Not accounting, tax or legal advice.
- You would receive
- Calculations shown line by line, three prioritized observations, uncertainties, next actions.
Example input (fictional)
Fictional category totals
Period: Fictional fiscal year (12 months). Basis: Cash basis, de-identified totals.
| Ref | Category | Budget | Actual | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Facilities | 10,000 | 11,800 | +1,800 |
| B2 | Ministry supplies | 4,000 | 3,600 | -400 |
| B3 | Missions (restricted fund) | 6,000 | 6,000 | 0 |
Example report — not an analysis of your input
Reviewed scope
Only the three fictional rows shown (B1–B3) for the stated period and basis.
Evidence
- Facilities: actual 11,800 − budget 10,000 = +1,800 (118% of budget) [B1]
- Ministry supplies: actual 3,600 − budget 4,000 = −400 (90% of budget) [B2]
- Missions (restricted fund): actual 6,000 − budget 6,000 = 0 (100% of budget) [B3]
Three prioritized improvements
- Review Facilities before next year: it is 1,800 over budget. [B1]
- Ministry supplies came in 400 under budget; check whether planned purchases were delayed. [B2]
- Report the restricted Missions fund on its own line, as shown in B3. [B3]
Uncertainties
- Compliance of B3 with its restriction cannot be assessed without the fund's stated purpose and expenditure detail.
- Category definitions may differ from your bookkeeping.
Next actions
- List Facilities invoices by quarter.
- Gather the Missions fund's written purpose and expense list.